Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dallas D. Cole v. Edward W. Murray, Director Attorney General of Virginia, 89-6501 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-6501 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 14, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 875 F.2d 314 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dallas D. COLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward W. MURRAY, Director Attorney General of Virginia, Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-6501. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1989.
More

875 F.2d 314
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dallas D. COLE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director Attorney General of Virginia,
Respondent-Appellee.

No. 89-6501.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 1989.
Decided May 8, 1989.
Rehearing Denied June 14, 1989.

Dallas D. Cole, appellant pro se.

Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Dallas D. Cole seeks to appeal the magistrate's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate. Cole v. Murray, C/A No. 88-499-R (E.D.Va. Dec. 5, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer