Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brian A. Brown v. U.S. Government, Claude Hilton, Judge Henry E. Hudson, Ray Connally, 89-7094 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7094 Visitors: 54
Filed: Jul. 26, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 878 F.2d 378 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Brian A. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. GOVERNMENT, Claude Hilton, Judge Henry E. Hudson, Ray Connally, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-7094. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted May
More

878 F.2d 378
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Brian A. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
U.S. GOVERNMENT, Claude Hilton, Judge Henry E. Hudson, Ray
Connally, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-7094.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 10, 1989.
Decided June 21, 1989.
Rehearing Denied July 26, 1989.

Brian A. Brown, appellant pro se.

Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Brian A. Brown appeals from the district court order transferring this case from the Eastern District of Virginia to the District of Columbia. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

2

Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 this Court has jurisdiction over appeals from final orders. A final order is one which disposes of all issues in dispute as to all parties. It "ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment." Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945).

3

As the order appealed from is not a final order, it is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. The district court has not directed entry of final judgment as to particular claims or parties under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), nor is the order appealable under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292. Finally, the order is not appealable as a collateral order under Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

4

Finding no basis for appellate jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues have been decided authoritatively.

5

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer