Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

89-7608 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7608 Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 01, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 889 F.2d 1084 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lloyd Nathaniel LASSITER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Stephen CHEEKS, Randy Wiggins, George Leroy Archer, Norris Samuel Harris, Heath Eugene Boone, Joshua Mizell, III, Rodell Dickens, Carl W. Fortner, Alfred
More

889 F.2d 1084
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lloyd Nathaniel LASSITER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Stephen CHEEKS, Randy Wiggins, George Leroy Archer, Norris
Samuel Harris, Heath Eugene Boone, Joshua Mizell,
III, Rodell Dickens, Carl W. Fortner,
Alfred Deloatch, Plaintiffs,
v.
J. Irving BAINES, Sheriff, C.R. Messenger, Food Service
Department, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-7608.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 19, 1989.
Decided Nov. 1, 1989.

Lloyd Nathaniel Lassiter, appellant pro se.

Annemarie Dinardo, Willcox & Savage, PC, for appellees.

Before HARRISON L. WINTER, CHAPMAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Lloyd Nathaniel Lassiter appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lassiter v. Baines, C/A No. 88-449-N (E.D.Va. Apr. 20, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer