Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re Dee Farmer, 89-8029 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-8029 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 10, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 888 F.2d 1385 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. In re Dee FARMER, Petitioner. No. 89-8029. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 19, 1989. Decided Oct. 10, 1989. Dee Farmer, petitioner pro se. Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN,
More

888 F.2d 1385
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re Dee FARMER, Petitioner.

No. 89-8029.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 19, 1989.
Decided Oct. 10, 1989.

Dee Farmer, petitioner pro se.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Dee Farmer, a federal prisoner, has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus. He complains of the district court's delay in ruling on his habeas corpus petition. Based on our review of the district court's actions in this case, we find that there has been no undue delay which would warrant our intervention at this time. We therefore deny the petition. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

2

PETITION DENIED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer