Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

88-2641 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-2641 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 04, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 922 F.2d 197 Melvin D. REUBER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FOOD CHEMICAL NEWS, INC., Defendant-Appellant, The Newsletter Association; Maryland-Delaware-District of Columbia Press Association; National Association of Broadcasters; The Radio-Television News Directors Association; The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press; Washington Merry-Go-Round, Inc.; The Washington Post, Amici Curiae, and Litton Industries, Inc.; Litton Bionetics, Inc.; Vincent T. Devita, Jr., National Cancer Institute, Nati
More

922 F.2d 197

Melvin D. REUBER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FOOD CHEMICAL NEWS, INC., Defendant-Appellant,
The Newsletter Association; Maryland-Delaware-District of
Columbia Press Association; National Association of
Broadcasters; The Radio-Television News Directors
Association; The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the
Press; Washington Merry-Go-Round, Inc.; The Washington
Post, Amici Curiae,
and
Litton Industries, Inc.; Litton Bionetics, Inc.; Vincent
T. Devita, Jr., National Cancer Institute, National
Institute of Health; Richard Adamson, National Cancer
Institute, National Institute of Health; William V.
Hartwell, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of
Health; William Payne, Frederick Cancer Research Center;
Michael G. Hanna, Jr., Frederick Cancer Research Center;
James C. Nance, Litton Bionetics, Inc.; I.J. Fidler,
Frederick Cancer Research Center; United States of America;
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; Environmental
Protection Agency, Defendants.

No. 88-2641.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

June 4, 1990.

Prior report: 899 F.2d 271.

ORDER

Upon a request for a poll of the court on the petition for rehearing en banc of Food Chemical News, a majority of the judges in regular active service having voted to rehear the case en banc,

It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the decision of the panel shall be, and the same hereby is, vacated.

1

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk set the same for en banc hearing at the first convenient opportunity.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer