Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Steven Allen Hedrick v. Charles M. Creecy, Jr., Superintendent, Caledonia Correctional Institution State of North Carolina, 88-6847 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-6847 Visitors: 30
Filed: Feb. 08, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 896 F.2d 1367 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Steven Allen HEDRICK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles M. CREECY, Jr., Superintendent, Caledonia Correctional Institution; State of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 88-6847. United States Court o
More

896 F.2d 1367
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steven Allen HEDRICK, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Charles M. CREECY, Jr., Superintendent, Caledonia
Correctional Institution; State of North
Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 88-6847.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 29, 1989.
Decided: Feb. 8, 1990.

Steven Allen Hedrick, appellant pro se.

Barry Steven McNeill, North Carolina Department of Justice, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Steven Allen Hedrick seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hedrick v. Creecy, C/A No. 87-112-C-C-M (W.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer