Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

89-1552 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-1552 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 23, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 904 F.2d 701 61 Ed. Law Rep. 827 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. In re TARA OF NORTH HILLS, a North Carolina General Partnership, Debtor. PIONEER SAVINGS BANK, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, and David W. Boone, trustee in bankruptcy for Tara of Nor
More

904 F.2d 701

61 Ed. Law Rep. 827

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re TARA OF NORTH HILLS, a North Carolina General
Partnership, Debtor.
PIONEER SAVINGS BANK, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
David W. Boone, trustee in bankruptcy for Tara of North
Hills Plaintiff,
v.
Barney K. HUANG; Lindy W. Huang, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 89-1552.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued: April 4, 1990.
Decided: May 23, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Chief District Judge. (CA-89-246-5-CIV).

Dean A. Shangler, Berman & Shangler, Durham, N.C., argued, for appellants.

John Lewis Shaw, Poyner & Spruill, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee; Laura Broughton Russell, Poyner & Spruill, Raleigh, N.C., on brief.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Barney and Lindy Huang appeal an order of the district court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Britt, J., affirming the Bankruptcy Court's order denying the Huangs' motion to set aside a consent order. Upon consideration of the record, the briefs of the parties, and oral argument, we find this appeal to be without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In Re: Tara of North Hills, No. 89-246-CIV-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 1989).

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer