Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dewey B. Compton v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Virginia Pocahontas Coal Company, 89-1833 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-1833 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 24, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 911 F.2d 721 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dewey B. COMPTON, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Virginia Pocahontas Coal Company, Respondents. No. 89-1833. United States Court of Appe
More

911 F.2d 721
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dewey B. COMPTON, Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Virginia Pocahontas
Coal Company, Respondents.

No. 89-1833.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 24, 1990.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (BRB No. 88-166-BLA)

Dewey B. Compton, petitioner pro se.

Laura E. Beverage, Jackson & Kelly, Charleston, W.Va., Sylvia Theresa Kaser, Roscoe Conkling Bryant, III, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., James Byron Leonard, United States Department of Labor, Arlington, Va., for respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE* and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Dewey B. Compton seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. Secs. 901 et seq. Our review of the record and the Board's decision and order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Compton v. DOWCP, BRB No. 88-166-BLA (Benefits Review Board, Oct. 31, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

Judge Sprouse recused himself from consideration of this appeal. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 46(d)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer