Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Frank Goodman, Jr. v. Harold Jackson, City of Charlotte, N.C., Police Department for the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, 89-6303 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-6303 Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 20, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 914 F.2d 248 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Frank GOODMAN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold JACKSON, City of Charlotte, N.C., Police Department for the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-6303. United States Court of Ap
More

914 F.2d 248
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frank GOODMAN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Harold JACKSON, City of Charlotte, N.C., Police Department
for the City of Charlotte, North Carolina,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6303.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 27, 1990.
Decided Sept. 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. James B. McMillan, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 87-0541-M)

Frank Goodman, Jr., appellant pro se.

Frank Bayard Aycock, III, Charlotte, N.C., for appellees.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Frank Goodman, Jr. appeals the directed verdicts for the city and the police department and the jury verdict for Harold Jackson entered in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 suit. Our review of the record, including audio tapes of the trial, reveal that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. Goodman v. Jackson, CA-87-0541-M (W.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer