Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Youseff Mohamed Salema, A/K/A Youseff Kyraine, A/K/A James Joseph Washington, 89-6424 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-6424 Visitors: 30
Filed: Nov. 19, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 918 F.2d 174 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Youseff Mohamed SALEMA, a/k/a Youseff Kyraine, a/k/a James Joseph Washington, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-6424. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circui
More

918 F.2d 174
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Youseff Mohamed SALEMA, a/k/a Youseff Kyraine, a/k/a James
Joseph Washington, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-6424.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Nov. 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-447, CA89-2720)

Youseff Mohamed Salema, appellant pro se.

William Warren Hamel, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Youseff Mohamed Salema appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Salema, CR-88-447, CA-89-2720 (D.Md. Oct. 3, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer