Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Calvin Haynes v. Gary Waters, Sheriff Captain Lilley Deputy Vincent, Portsmouth City Jail, 89-6732 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-6732 Visitors: 31
Filed: Mar. 02, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 898 F.2d 145 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Calvin HAYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary WATERS, Sheriff; Captain Lilley; Deputy Vincent, Portsmouth City Jail, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-6732. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitte
More

898 F.2d 145
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Calvin HAYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gary WATERS, Sheriff; Captain Lilley; Deputy Vincent,
Portsmouth City Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6732.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 30, 1989.
Decided: March 2, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 88-281-AM)

Calvin Haynes, appellant pro se.

Gary A. Bryant, Wilcox & Savage, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Calvin Haynes appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haynes v. Waters, C/A No. 88-281-AM (E.D.Va. June 26, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer