Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bernard Thomas Church v. H.L. Thomas, Jr. Claude Lynch Mark Engelke, Correctional Officer, Bernard Thomas Church v. C.R. Webb W.P. Robinson, Jr., 89-6775 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-6775 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 09, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 900 F.2d 250 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Bernard Thomas CHURCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H.L. THOMAS, Jr.; Claude Lynch; Mark Engelke, Correctional Officer, Defendants-Appellees. Bernard Thomas CHURCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.R. WEBB; W.P. Robins
More

900 F.2d 250
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Bernard Thomas CHURCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
H.L. THOMAS, Jr.; Claude Lynch; Mark Engelke, Correctional
Officer, Defendants-Appellees.
Bernard Thomas CHURCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.R. WEBB; W.P. Robinson, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 89-6775, 89-6777.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 27, 1989.
Decided March 9, 1990.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, United States Magistrate. (CA Nos. 88-590-R, 88-602-R).

Bernard Thomas Church, appellant pro se.

Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Bernard Thomas Church noted these appeals outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). We consolidate these actions for appeal. The time periods established by Fed.R.App.P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider these cases. We therefore dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer