Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Larry F. Dean v. State of West Virginia Circuit Court of Marion County, Fairmont, West Virginia Fred L. Fox, II, 89-6796 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-6796 Visitors: 26
Filed: Feb. 13, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 896 F.2d 1366 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Larry F. DEAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; Circuit Court of Marion County, Fairmont, West Virginia; Fred L. Fox, II, Respondents-Appellees. No. 89-6796. United States Court of Appeals,
More

896 F.2d 1366
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Larry F. DEAN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; Circuit Court of Marion County,
Fairmont, West Virginia; Fred L. Fox, II,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-6796.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 27, 1989.
Decided: Feb. 13, 1990.

Larry F. Dean, appellant pro se.

Patrick N. Wilson, County Attorney's Office, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Larry F. Dean noted this appeal outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed.R.App.P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case.* We therefore deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

2

DISMISSED.

*

Dean's original habeas petition and this petition for rehearing were denied without prejudice. Accordingly, Dean may properly raise his claim by filing a new habeas petition in the district court after exhausting his state remedies

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer