Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Stanley Zebulun, A/K/A Carl Rogers, 89-7670 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 89-7670 Visitors: 40
Filed: Feb. 28, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 896 F.2d 1368 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stanley ZEBULUN, a/k/a Carl Rogers, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-7670. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Sept. 21, 1989. Decided: Fe
More

896 F.2d 1368
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Stanley ZEBULUN, a/k/a Carl Rogers, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-7670.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 21, 1989.
Decided: Feb. 8, 1990.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 28, 1990.

Stanley Zebulun, appellant pro se.

Jamie M. Bennett, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Stanley Zebulun appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. Zebulun argued that he should have been resentenced after the district court vacated two of his three convictions under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113. We disagree. See United States v. Amos, 566 F.2d 899, 901 (4th Cir.1977). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer