Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Charles Thompson, Jr. v. Consolidation Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 90-2616 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-2616 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 24, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 914 F.2d 1492 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Charles THOMPSON, Jr., Petitioner, v. CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 90-2616. United States Court of App
More

914 F.2d 1492
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles THOMPSON, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.

No. 90-2616.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 30, 1990.
Decided Sept. 24, 1990.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (BRB Nos. 87-3102-BLA, qtg-sw-nrkv.

Charles Thompson, Jr., petitioner pro se.

Douglas Allan Smoot, Jackson & Kelly, Charleston, W.Va.; Michael John Denney, Priscilla Anne Schwab, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Charles Thompson seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. Secs. 901 et seq. Our review of the record and the Board's decision and order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Thompson v. Consolidation Coal Co., BRB Nos. 87-3102-BLA, ajz-uf-hwdh(Ben.Rev.Bd. Nov. 30, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

In view of our disposition of this case, Thompson's motion to submit new evidence is denied

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer