Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

90-2910 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-2910 Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 20, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 918 F.2d 955 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Douglas SALYER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph P. CONNORS, Sr., Trustee; Paul R. Dean, Trustee; Thomas H. Saggau, Trustee; William Miller, Trustee; Donald E. Pierce, Jr.; United Mine Workers of America Heal
More

918 F.2d 955
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Douglas SALYER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph P. CONNORS, Sr., Trustee; Paul R. Dean, Trustee;
Thomas H. Saggau, Trustee; William Miller, Trustee; Donald
E. Pierce, Jr.; United Mine Workers of America Health and
Retirement Fund, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-2910.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Nov. 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-89-148-B).

Douglas Salyer, appellant pro se.

Andree Marie St. Martin, UMWA Health & Retirement Funds, Washington, D.C., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Douglas Salyer appeals from the district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment and affirming a decision of the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan to deny Salyer's application for a disability pension. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Salyer v. Connors, CA-89-148-B (W.D.Va. May 31, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer