Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Basil F. Graham v. Tri-Chem Liquid Embroidery Retail Sales, and Artex Arts Crafts Products, 90-3112 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-3112 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 04, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 917 F.2d 1301 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Basil F. GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRI-CHEM LIQUID EMBROIDERY RETAIL SALES, Defendant-Appellee, and Artex Arts Crafts Products, Defendant. No. 90-3112. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
More

917 F.2d 1301
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Basil F. GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TRI-CHEM LIQUID EMBROIDERY RETAIL SALES, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Artex Arts Crafts Products, Defendant.

No. 90-3112.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 27, 1990.
Decided Nov. 9, 1990.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 4, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Richard L. Williams, District Judge. (CA-86-6-W)

Basil F. Graham, appellant pro se.

James C. West, Jr., West & Jones, Clarksburg, W.Va., for appellees.

N.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Basil F. Graham appeals from the district court's order granting defendant Tri-Chem, Inc.'s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Graham v. Tri-Chem Liquid Embroidery, CA-86-6-W (N.D.W.Va. July 18, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer