Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

William Lebron Church v. C.E. Thompson Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 90-6547 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6547 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 19, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 907 F.2d 1137 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. William Lebron CHURCH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C.E. THOMPSON; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Respondents-Appellees. No. 90-6547. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitte
More

907 F.2d 1137
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Lebron CHURCH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
C.E. THOMPSON; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 90-6547.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 4, 1990.
Decided June 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, United States Magistrate. (C/A No. 89-537-R)

William Lebron Church, appellant pro se.

Katherine Baldwin Toone, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

William Lebron Church seeks to appeal the magistrate's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate. Church v. Thompson, C/A No. 89-537-R (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer