Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

90-6556 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6556 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 09, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 907 F.2d 1137 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Tyrone C. COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Dan E. Huff; Molly Wannaker, D/W; Tommy L. Hughston, Jr., Judge, in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No.
More

907 F.2d 1137
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Tyrone C. COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Dan E. Huff;
Molly Wannaker, D/W; Tommy L. Hughston, Jr.,
Judge, in their official capacities,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6556.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 4, 1990.
Decided June 15, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied July 9, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. C. Weston Houck, District Judge. (C/A No. 88-123-3)

Tyrone C. Cooper, appellant pro se.

Robert Eric Petersen, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Columbia, S.C., for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Tyrone C. Cooper appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cooper v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, CA-88-123-3 (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer