Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

90-6577 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6577 Visitors: 42
Filed: Nov. 19, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 918 F.2d 173 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Delton L. DORTY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. M.D. WILKINSON, Nurses, Unknown Name, Aaron Johnson, Secretary, Nurse Shearn, Unknown Doctor, Director of Medical Practice at Central Prison, United States Post
More

918 F.2d 173
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Delton L. DORTY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
M.D. WILKINSON, Nurses, Unknown Name, Aaron Johnson,
Secretary, Nurse Shearn, Unknown Doctor, Director of Medical
Practice at Central Prison, United States Postal Service
Worker or Unnamed Supervisor, North Carolina Parole Board
Commissioner Chairman and Members, H.J. Carter,
Superintendent, Warrenton Correctional Unit, Jim Dupree,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6577.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Nov. 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-88-620-CRT)

Delton L. Dorty, Sr., appellant pro se.

Valerie Bateman, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.D., James Gordon Carpenter, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Delton L. Dorty, Sr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dorty v. Wilkinson, CA-88-620-CRT (E.D.N.C. April 18, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer