Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Isadore Perry v. U.S. Parole Commission, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, 90-6646 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6646 Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 19, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 918 F.2d 174 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Isadore PERRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 90-6646. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted
More

918 F.2d 174
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Isadore PERRY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Attorney General of the State of
North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 90-6646.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 29, 1990.
Decided Nov. 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. James B. McMillan, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-285-C-C-M)

Isadore Perry, appellant pro se.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Isadore Perry appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Perry v. United States Parole Comm'n, CA-90-285-C-C-M (W.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer