Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Douglas Henry Thornton, 90-7139 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-7139 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 18, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 920 F.2d 927 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas Henry THORNTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-7139. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 3, 1990. Decided Dec. 18, 1990. Appe
More

920 F.2d 927
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Douglas Henry THORNTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-7139.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 1990.
Decided Dec. 18, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-77-584; CA-90-1797-S; CR-77-578-S)

Douglas Henry Thornton, appellant pro se.

Douglas Brooke Farquhar, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Douglas Henry Thornton appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thornton, CR-77-584; CA-90-1797-S; CR-77-578-S (D.Md. July 31, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer