Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ronald Lee Sunkins v. Davis Mapp, Sheriff, Dr. Gorman, Medical Department, Norfolk City Jail, 90-7159 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-7159 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 18, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 920 F.2d 927 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronald Lee SUNKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Davis MAPP, Sheriff, Dr. Gorman, Medical Department, Norfolk City Jail, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-7159. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitt
More

920 F.2d 927
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald Lee SUNKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Davis MAPP, Sheriff, Dr. Gorman, Medical Department, Norfolk
City Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-7159.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 1990.
Decided Dec. 18, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, District Judge. (CA-90-153-AM)

Ronald Lee Sunkins, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Ronald Lee Sunkins appeals the district court's dismissal of this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for failing to pay the assessed filing fee. Finding that the district court properly complied with the procedures approved in Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action without prejudice, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer