Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

90-7293 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-7293 Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 04, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 912 F.2d 464 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert D. SHEPARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Loraine E. EUBANKS, West Virginia Penitentiary Magistrate, H.D. Gillispie, Lt. Col., William Arnold, Sgt., Jerry C. Hedrick, Warden, A.V. Dodrill, Commission, indi
More

912 F.2d 464
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert D. SHEPARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Loraine E. EUBANKS, West Virginia Penitentiary Magistrate,
H.D. Gillispie, Lt. Col., William Arnold, Sgt., Jerry C.
Hedrick, Warden, A.V. Dodrill, Commission, individually and
in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-7293.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 28, 1990.
Decided Sept. 4, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-89-34-E-K)

Robert D. Shepard, appellant pro se.

James Alexander Swart, Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia, Charleston, W.Va., for appellees.

N.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Robert D. Shepard appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shepard v. Eubanks, CA-89-34-E-K (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 5, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer