Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

90-7363 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-7363 Visitors: 25
Filed: Nov. 21, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 918 F.2d 955 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Henry PARRISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. POWHATAN RECEPTION & CLASSIFICATION CENTER, PRCC Medical Department, Mrs. McNealey, Defendants-Appellees. Henry PARRISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David A. WILLIAMS, War
More

918 F.2d 955
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Henry PARRISH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
POWHATAN RECEPTION & CLASSIFICATION CENTER, PRCC Medical
Department, Mrs. McNealey, Defendants-Appellees.
Henry PARRISH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David A. WILLIAMS, Warden, Dr. Sarker, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 90-7363, 90-7364.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 28, 1990.
Decided Nov. 21, 1990.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-90-188; CA-90-225)

Henry Parrish, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Henry Parrish appeals the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the records and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Parrish v. Powhatan Reception, CA-90-188 (E.D.Va. July 30, 1990; Parrish v. Williams, CA-90-225 (E.D.Va. Aug. 15, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED,

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer