Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Michael Craig Clark v. State of North Carolina John T. Chaffin, Chief, District Court Judge, 90-2242 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-2242 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 28, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 927 F.2d 595 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Michael Craig CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; John T. Chaffin, Chief, District Court Judge, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-2242. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitt
More

927 F.2d 595
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael Craig CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; John T. Chaffin, Chief, District
Court Judge, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-2242.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 4, 1991.
Decided Feb. 28, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-39-2-CIV-D)

Michael Craig Clark, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Michael Craig Clark appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clark v. North Carolina, CA-90-39-2-CIV-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 29, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer