Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

90-2490 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-2490 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 15, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 940 F.2d 653 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Philis SHIPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BALTIMORE, E.B.W. Properties, Incorporated, Harry W. Stevens Maintenance Services, Incorporated, the Baltimore Orioles, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees. No
More

940 F.2d 653
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Philis SHIPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF BALTIMORE, E.B.W. Properties, Incorporated, Harry W.
Stevens Maintenance Services, Incorporated, the
Baltimore Orioles, Incorporated,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-2490.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 7, 1991.
Decided Aug. 15, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-89-2049-S)

Arelious Calvin Wilson, McCants & Dunbar, Silver Spring, Md. (Argued), for appellant; Leonard L. McCants, McCants & Dunbar, Silver Spring, Md., on brief. Michael John Collins, Smith, Somerville & Case, Baltimore, Md., (Argued), for appellees Baltimore Orioles and City of Baltimore, Jeffrey J. Plum, Smith, Somerville & Case, Baltimore, Md., on brief.

David W. Allen, Goodell, Devries, Leech & Gray, Baltimore, Md., (argued), for appellee Stevens Maintenance;

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge, CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and CLAUDE M. HILTON, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

After a full review of the record in this case, this court hereby affirms the judgment of the district court which granted motions for summary judgment to The Baltimore Orioles and Harry M. Stevens Maintenance Service. We affirm on the reasoning of the district court as expressed by U.S. Magistrate Klein in his memorandum opinion. Shipman v. The Baltimore Orioles, Inc., CA-89-2049-S (D.Md. Oct. 5, 1990).

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer