Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

90-6420 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6420 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 26, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 931 F.2d 54 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wayne WINEBRENNER, Individually and as Warden of the Eastern Correctional Institution, Merry Coplin, Individually and as Warden of the Maryland Reception Diagnostic and
More

931 F.2d 54
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Aaron HOLSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wayne WINEBRENNER, Individually and as Warden of the Eastern
Correctional Institution, Merry Coplin, Individually and as
Warden of the Maryland Reception Diagnostic and
Classification Center, Name Unknown, Individually and as
Commander of the 4 p.m. to 12 a.m. Shift of the Eastern
Correctional Institution, Name Unknown, Individually and as
Commander of the D.O.C. Transportation Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6420.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 8, 1991.
Decided April 26, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-87-3358-K)

Aaron Holsey, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Aaron Holsey appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holsey v. Winebrenner, CA-87-3358-K (D.Md. Oct. 15, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Holsey's request for appointment of counsel is denied.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer