Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joshua Leroy Johnson v. C.E. Thompson, Warden, 90-6438 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 90-6438 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 27, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 927 F.2d 596 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Joshua Leroy JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.E. THOMPSON, Warden, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-6438. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1991. Decided Feb. 27, 1991. Appeal fr
More

927 F.2d 596
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joshua Leroy JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
C.E. THOMPSON, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-6438.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 4, 1991.
Decided Feb. 27, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-1221-N)

Joshua Leroy Johnson, appellant pro se.

Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Joshua Leroy Johnson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Thompson, CA-90-1221-N (E.D.Va. Nov. 16, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer