Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

91-1172 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-1172 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 24, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 947 F.2d 941 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Dorothy P. LITZENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John H. LITZENBERG, d/b/a A.C. Litzenberg & Son, Incorporated, d/b/a Cecil County Land Corporation, d/b/a Cecil County Health Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-1172. United Sta
More

947 F.2d 941

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Dorothy P. LITZENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John H. LITZENBERG, d/b/a A.C. Litzenberg & Son,
Incorporated, d/b/a Cecil County Land Corporation,
d/b/a Cecil County Health Department,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-1172.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 30, 1991.
Decided Oct. 24, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Norman P. Ramsey, District Judge. (CA-91-1669; CA-91-1670; CA-91-1671)

Dorothy P. Litzenberg, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Dorothy P. Litzenberg appeals from the district court's order dismissing three civil complaints pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Litzenberg v. Litzenberg, No. CA-91-1669; No. CA-91-1670; No. CA-91-1671 (D.Md. June 27, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

We deny Litzenberg's motion for emergency stay of a hearing in the state court filed September 18, 1991

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer