Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Donald Lee Paschal v. United States, 91-2138 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-2138 Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 26, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 952 F.2d 396 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Donald Lee PASCHAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-2138. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1991. Decided Dec. 26, 1991. Appeal from the United States Di
More

952 F.2d 396

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Donald Lee PASCHAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-2138.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 1991.
Decided Dec. 26, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. (CA-89-166-D), Norwood C. Tilley, Jr., District Judge.

Donald Lee Paschal, appellant pro se.

Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, N.C., for U.S.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Donald Lee Paschal appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Paschal v. United States, No. CA-89-166-D (M.D.N.C. May 31, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer