Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

John W. Bennett Dana L. Derr John M. Weatherington, and Veleacha Robinson v. Amstat Manufacturing Inc., and American Saturated Felt Mfg., Inc., 91-2541 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-2541 Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 19, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 948 F.2d 1280 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. John W. BENNETT; Dana L. Derr; John M. Weatherington, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Veleacha Robinson, Plaintiff, v. AMSTAT MANUFACTURING INC., Defendant-Appellee, and American Saturated Felt Mfg., Inc., Defendant. No. 91-2541. Unit
More

948 F.2d 1280

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John W. BENNETT; Dana L. Derr; John M. Weatherington,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and
Veleacha Robinson, Plaintiff,
v.
AMSTAT MANUFACTURING INC., Defendant-Appellee,
and
American Saturated Felt Mfg., Inc., Defendant.

No. 91-2541.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 28, 1991.
Decided Nov. 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-89-872-MJG)

John W. Bennett, Dana L. Derr, John M. Weatherington, appellants pro se.

Michael John Jack, Robert Emmett Sharkey, Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, SPROUSE, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

John W. Bennett, Dana L. Derr, and John M. Weatherington appeal from the district court's orders granting defendant's motion for summary judgment in a civil action arising out of an employment dispute. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bennett v. Amstat Manufacturing Inc., No. CA89-872-MJG (D.Md. Feb. 14 and Apr. 18, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer