Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mose Horn v. Hobbs Brothers Coal Company Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, 91-2624 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-2624 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 09, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 948 F.2d 1281 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Mose HORN, Petitioner, v. HOBBS BROTHERS COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 91-2624. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct
More

948 F.2d 1281

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Mose HORN, Petitioner,
v.
HOBBS BROTHERS COAL COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.

No. 91-2624.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 28, 1991.
Decided Nov. 19, 1991.
As Amended Dec. 9, 1991.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (89-2612-BLA)

Mose Horn, petitioner pro se.

Timothy Ward Gresham, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, Abingdon, Va.; Michael John Denney, Steven D. Breeskin, Christian P. Barber, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, SPROUSE, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Mose Horn seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1991). Our review of the record and the Board's decision and order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Horn v. Hobbs Bros. Coal Co., No. 89-2612-BLA (Ben.Rev.Bd. June 27, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer