Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ralph Seagle v. Aaron Johnson Sherill Allen Ralph Stamey Garland Shook Lewis Davis, 91-6009 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6009 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 20, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 929 F.2d 694 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ralph SEAGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aaron JOHNSON; Sherill Allen; Ralph Stamey; Garland Shook; Lewis Davis, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-6009. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Mar
More

929 F.2d 694
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ralph SEAGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Aaron JOHNSON; Sherill Allen; Ralph Stamey; Garland
Shook; Lewis Davis, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6009.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 1991.
Decided March 20, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Woodrow Wilson Jones, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-22-A-C)

Ralph Seagle, appellant pro se.

Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Ralph Seagle appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Seagle v. Johnson, CA-90-22-A-C (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer