Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Henry Clifford Byrd, Sr. v. Baltimore City Jail, Officials, City of Baltimore, Maryland, 91-6042 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6042 Visitors: 30
Filed: Jun. 19, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 935 F.2d 1285 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Henry Clifford BYRD, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALTIMORE CITY JAIL, OFFICIALS, City of Baltimore, Maryland, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-6042. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted J
More

935 F.2d 1285
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Henry Clifford BYRD, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE CITY JAIL, OFFICIALS, City of Baltimore, Maryland,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6042.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 1991.
Decided June 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-90-3136-S)

Henry Clifford Byrd, Sr., appellant pro se.

Frank Charles Derr, Melvin J. Jews, City Solicitor's Office, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Henry Clifford Byrd, Sr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Byrd v. Baltimore City Jail, CA-90-3136-S (D.Md. Feb. 28, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer