Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Walter L. Green v. Jane Does, Nurses, 91-6055 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6055 Visitors: 36
Filed: Jun. 14, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 935 F.2d 1286 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Walter L. GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jane DOES, Nurses, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-6055. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 3, 1991. Decided June 14, 1991. Appeal from the
More

935 F.2d 1286
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Walter L. GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Jane DOES, Nurses, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6055.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 1991.
Decided June 14, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District Judge. (CA-90-1352-N)

Walter L. Green, appellant pro se.

Edward Meade Macon, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, V., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Walter L. Green noted this appeal outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed.R.App.P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer