Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ronnie Wayne Neill, 91-6108 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6108 Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 15, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 946 F.2d 888 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnie Wayne NEILL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-6108. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 10, 1991. Decided Oct. 15, 1991. Appeal from the United States
More

946 F.2d 888

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ronnie Wayne NEILL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-6108.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 10, 1991.
Decided Oct. 15, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-87-64-G, CA-90-185)

Ronnie Wayne Neill, appellant pro se.

Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, N.C., for appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Ronnie Wayne Neill appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Neill, CR-87-64-G (M.D.N.C. June 20, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer