Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Frizell Stephens v. Raymond M. Muncy, Warden, 91-6258 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6258 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 22, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 929 F.2d 694 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Frizell STEPHENS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raymond M. MUNCY, Warden, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-6258. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 4, 1991. Decided March 22, 1991. Appeal f
More

929 F.2d 694
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Frizell STEPHENS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Raymond M. MUNCY, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-6258.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 4, 1991.
Decided March 22, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-89-547-N)

Frizell Stephens, appellant pro se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va., 751 F. Supp. 1214.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Frizell Stephens appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stephens v. Muncy, CA-89-547-N (E.D.Va. Dec. 10, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer