Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Kennedy Elliott Barkley, 91-6517 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6517 Visitors: 28
Filed: Apr. 11, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 930 F.2d 23 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kennedy Elliott BARKLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-6517. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 26, 1991. Decided April 11, 1991. A
More

930 F.2d 23
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kennedy Elliott BARKLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-6517.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 26, 1991.
Decided April 11, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Chief District Judge. (CR-86-101)

Kennedy Elliott Barkley, appellant pro se.

Max Oliver Cogburn, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, N.C., for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Kennedy Elliott Barkley appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Barkley, CR-86-101 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer