Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

91-6570 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6570 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 19, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 941 F.2d 1207 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lawrence SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dave WILLIAMS, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center, William Welsh, Dr., John Doe, Defendants-Appellees, and Ed Murray, Director, Toni V. Bair, Regional Administrator, Dr. Frye, Office of H
More

941 F.2d 1207

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lawrence SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dave WILLIAMS, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center, William
Welsh, Dr., John Doe, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Ed Murray, Director, Toni V. Bair, Regional Administrator,
Dr. Frye, Office of Health Services, Dr. Kapele,
Powhatan Correctional Center, Hospital
Administrators and Doctors, Defendants.

No. 91-6570.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 24, 1991.
Decided Aug. 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

Lawrence Scott, appellant pro se.

Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Lawrence Scott appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scott v. Williams, CA-89-746-R (E.D.Va. Apr. 5, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

We note that the district court has not yet acted upon Scott's motion to set aside judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). That issue is therefore not before this Court

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer