Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Engress L. Harris v. Fay Lassiter Attorney General of North Carolina, 91-6574 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6574 Visitors: 29
Filed: Nov. 07, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 947 F.2d 940 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Engress L. HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Fay LASSITER; Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-6574. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 15, 1991. Decided Nov. 7, 1991. Appea
More

947 F.2d 940

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Engress L. HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Fay LASSITER; Attorney General of North Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 91-6574.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 15, 1991.
Decided Nov. 7, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-90-657-HC-H)

Engress L. Harris, appellant pro se.

Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Engress L. Harris seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Lassiter, CA-90-657-HC-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer