Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

John Wesley Stewart v. David A. Smith, J.M. Perutelli, John Does, R.G. Picarella, Marsha Altizer, 91-6757 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-6757 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 09, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 937 F.2d 603 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. John Wesley STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David A. SMITH, J.M. Perutelli, John Does, R.G. Picarella, Marsha Altizer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-6757. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Sub
More

937 F.2d 603
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John Wesley STEWART, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David A. SMITH, J.M. Perutelli, John Does, R.G. Picarella,
Marsha Altizer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-6757.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 1991.
Decided July 9, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-90-136-R)

John Wesley Stewart, appellant pro se.

Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Edward Meade Macon, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

John Wesley Stewart appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stewart v. Smith, CA-90-136-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 29, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer