Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jerome Wallace v. Turkman, M.D., Phillip Seaman, P.A., 91-7056 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7056 Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 13, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 940 F.2d 654 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jerome WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TURKMAN, M.D., Phillip Seaman, P.A., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-7056. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 26, 1991. Decided Aug. 13, 1991
More

940 F.2d 654
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jerome WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TURKMAN, M.D., Phillip Seaman, P.A., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7056.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 1991.
Decided Aug. 13, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-91-482-WN)

Jerome Wallace, appellant pro se.

Phillip Melton Andrews, Kevin Francis Arthur, Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Jerome Wallace appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wallace v. Turkman, CA-91-482-WN (D.Md. Mar. 14, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer