Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Victor D. McMiller v. Darrell McMurray Sheriff, William C. "Bud" Flanary, Chief Jailor, 91-7071 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7071 Visitors: 26
Filed: Aug. 08, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 940 F.2d 652 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Victor D. McMILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Darrell McMURRAY, Sheriff, William C. "Bud" Flanary, Chief Jailor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-7071. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Ma
More

940 F.2d 652
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Victor D. McMILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Darrell McMURRAY, Sheriff, William C. "Bud" Flanary, Chief
Jailor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7071.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 29, 1991.
Decided Aug. 8, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-90-222-R)

Victor D. McMiller, appellant pro se.

Robert Vincent Ward, Woodward, Miles & Flannagan, P.C., Bristol, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Victor D. McMiller appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McMiller v. McMurray, CA-90-222-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 29, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer