Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

91-7176 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7176 Visitors: 25
Filed: Nov. 05, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 947 F.2d 940 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Matthew Troy CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary LIVERMAN; Joseph Karpowski; Detective Barnes; Ms. Brown; Alotha C. Willis; City of Portsmouth; Chief of Police, City of Portsmouth; Johnny E. Morrison; Gary Waters; Nurse Johnson,
More

947 F.2d 940

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Matthew Troy CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gary LIVERMAN; Joseph Karpowski; Detective Barnes; Ms.
Brown; Alotha C. Willis; City of Portsmouth; Chief of
Police, City of Portsmouth; Johnny E. Morrison; Gary
Waters; Nurse Johnson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7176.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 11, 1991.
Decided Nov. 5, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, District Judge. (CA-90-682-R)

Matthew Troy Carter, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Matthew Troy Carter appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carter v. Liverman, CA-90-682-R (E.D.Va. Dec. 28, 1990; July 8, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer