Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Steve Wilson v. Charles M. Creecy Edward Jerry Earls Dennis Lucas William Carroll, Jr. Lesley Gutrell Billy Bass Kenneth Larnier, 91-7193 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7193 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 18, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 946 F.2d 889 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Steve WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles M. CREECY; Edward Jerry Earls; Dennis Lucas; William Carroll, Jr.; Lesley Gutrell; Billy Bass; Kenneth Larnier, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-7193. United States Court of Appeals, Fourt
More

946 F.2d 889

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steve WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles M. CREECY; Edward Jerry Earls; Dennis Lucas;
William Carroll, Jr.; Lesley Gutrell; Billy
Bass; Kenneth Larnier, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7193.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 30, 1991.
Decided Oct. 18, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-432-CRT-F)

Steve Wilson, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Steve Wilson appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Creecy, No. CA-91-432-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Jul. 18, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer