Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

John D. Simpson v. Edward Murray, 91-7250 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7250 Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 24, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 931 F.2d 55 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. John D. SIMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Edward MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-7250. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted April 8, 1991. Decided April 24, 1991. Appeal from the Uni
More

931 F.2d 55
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John D. SIMPSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward MURRAY, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 91-7250.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 8, 1991.
Decided April 24, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-90-0268)

John D. Simpson, appellant pro se.

Gayl Branum Carr, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

John D. Simpson seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Simpson v. Murray, CA-90-0268-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 19, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer