Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jawad Abulhawa, 91-7545 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-7545 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 19, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 935 F.2d 1287 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jawad ABULHAWA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-7545. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 3, 1991. Decided June 19, 1991. Appeal from
More

935 F.2d 1287
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jawad ABULHAWA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-7545.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 1991.
Decided June 19, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Chief District Judge. (CR-86-710-C-P; CA-90-193-P)

Jawad Abulhawa, appellant pro se.

Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, N.C., for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Jawad Abulhawa appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Abulhawa, CR-86-710-C-P; CA-90-193-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer