Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re J.R. Orgain, Jr., and the Future Generations of Brunswick & Mecklenburg Counties of Virginia and Warren & Northampton Counties of North Carolina, 91-8104 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-8104 Visitors: 25
Filed: Apr. 23, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 931 F.2d 55 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. In re J.R. ORGAIN, Jr., and the Future Generations of Brunswick & Mecklenburg Counties of Virginia and Warren & Northampton Counties of North Carolina, Petitioner. No. 91-8104. United States Court of Appeals
More

931 F.2d 55
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
In re J.R. ORGAIN, Jr., and the Future Generations of
Brunswick & Mecklenburg Counties of Virginia and
Warren & Northampton Counties of North
Carolina, Petitioner.

No. 91-8104.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 8, 1991.
Decided April 23, 1991.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

J.R. Orgain, Jr., petitioner pro se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

J.R. Orgain, Jr. brought this mandamus petition seeking an order directing the district court to rule in his favor. Mandamus relief cannot be used as a substitute for appeal. In re: United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979). Accordingly, we grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis and deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid in the decisional process.

2

PETITION DENIED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer