Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Connie F. Williams v. James E. Williams, Ii, and John R. Williams Janice Williams, 91-1192 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 91-1192 Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 03, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 956 F.2d 1163 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Connie F. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. WILLIAMS, II, Defendant-Appellant, and John R. WILLIAMS; Janice Williams, Defendants. No. 91-1192. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 17, 1992. Decid
More

956 F.2d 1163

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Connie F. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James E. WILLIAMS, II, Defendant-Appellant,
and
John R. WILLIAMS; Janice Williams, Defendants.

No. 91-1192.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 17, 1992.
Decided March 3, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, District Judge. (CA-91-829)

James E. Williams, II, appellant pro se.

James Lynn Satterfield, Princeton, W. Va., for appellee.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

James E. Williams, II, appeals from the district court's order remanding a case removed from a West Virginia state court. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Williams, No. CA-91-829 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 14, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer